Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Cell phones

Ok, I am currently working at a local gas station. Every day, people come in to the store, talking on their cell phones, not having the common courtesy to drop their conversation in the middle so they can exchange pleasantries with me. How rude of them!!

The sad thing is (in my mind), is how many people actually think that way. I do actually work at a local gas station and everyday my co-workers complain about rude people talking on their cell phones and how they are just as rude back. The concept confuses me, so I ask them why it is rude, to which question I get a blank stare and a statement - "They were talking on their cell phone!"

Oh, yeah, I remind myself as I slap my forehead for missing the obviousnes of it. I still couldn't figure out what the big deal is. That is, until I saw the other side of it - Two people standing at the counter talking and not paying attention to the clerk. I looked at the clerk and instead of a look of consternation, they were smiling and following the conversation. I then thought back to similar conversations I have had with servers in restaraunts, and the answer became clear.

The complaining clerk/server/patron is doing so because they can't hear the other side of the conversation. Yup, that's right - the person on the cell phone is being rude by not allowing the bystanders the chance to eavesdrop. Seriously. And I got a follow-up confirmation of this when later that day a customer was talking on speaker phone - the clerk had the same smile they did when following the conversation of the two people present. Wow - eavesdropping on conversations that take place around us is so accepted and commonplace that when we are denied the opportunity we vociferously complain about the violator and demand that the means of this obstruction to our voyerism be banned in restaraunts and such.

Ridiculous.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Are we inherently unhappy in relationships?

Well, the title is kind of mis-leading, I just couldn't think of a one-liner for the thoughts in this post. This is more a trail of thoughts in regaurd to "leagues" when it comes to relationships - ie, "That person is out of my league."
What exactly does that mean? Is that person inherently better than you? Smarter? More attractive? More successfull? More to the point, why does it matter? If you are interested in someone, why not just take the chance that they may be interested in you? Is it that we automatically classify potential mates based on a pre-concieved set of criteria, automatically discounting anyone that doesn't match a certain set of superficial qualities?
How do we know that the woman you just snubbed because she wasn't attractive enough to deserve your attention isn't the person that you could love so deeply you couldn't imagine life without her? How about that man that has a job that is beneith your level, how do you know he isn't the kindest, gentlest, most perfect match for you?
When we do find someone that is in our league, are we just settling for something less than we want? Is that beautiful, rich couple really happy that they found each other, or are they together because they look good together and "fit" financially? Are they really happy. How about the overweight average income couple. Do they both feel like they settled for their partner because they couldn't find someone better? Or are they more happy becuase they look past physical appearance and income status to the person underneath and found there someone they could truely love?
I ask this becuase when I look around, I very seldom see attractive/unattractive, rich/poor, or similar couples. People, for the most part, find relationships in their "league" and stay there. But, are they truely happy with who they have found or is there some seed of unhappiness deep down inside that says "I couldn't do any better, so I'll live with it."
Ah well, I don't suppose that one will ever be answered, at least not honestly...